SSG coverage claim · MITRE ATLAS-mapped
Browse AI-system risk by MITRE ATLAS
Browse the MITRE ATLAS v2026.08 tactic & technique taxonomy for AI systems, alongside SSG's own derived coverage tier for each technique — see the methodology note below for exactly what that tier does and does not claim.
Adversaries may coerce an agentic AI system into performing computationally expensive tool calls that waste resources and consume API budgets. They may utilize [LLM Prompt Injection](/techniques/AML.T0051) or [AI Agent Tool Data Poisoning](/techniques/AML.T0099) with directives t…
Tactics
Impact
ATT&CK cross-reference
No Enterprise ATT&CK cross-reference.
ATLAS mitigations & SSG coverage
AML.M0035
AI Red Team
Partial
SHAKEDOWN benchmark exercises containment; not a full red-team program
AML.M0036
Limit AI Workload Resource Consumption
Not addressed
Workload resource quota enforcement
Methodology. Catalog: MITRE ATLAS v2026.08 (atlas.mitre.org).
Coverage tiers are derived from MITRE's own published mitigation↔technique mappings — never hand-assigned per technique.
SSG's claim is limited to which ATLAS mitigations it implements as controls; it does not claim to cover ATLAS techniques directly.
A tier records which SSG control exists for a MITRE-published mitigation — it is not a statement about outcome, and it is not a certification, an audit result, or an endorsement by MITRE.