SSG coverage claim · MITRE ATLAS-mapped
Browse AI-system risk by MITRE ATLAS
Browse the MITRE ATLAS v2026.08 tactic & technique taxonomy for AI systems, alongside SSG's own derived coverage tier for each technique — see the methodology note below for exactly what that tier does and does not claim.
Adversaries may deliberately drive a victim's AI services beyond normal operating capacity with the intent of increasing the cost of services. This may be achieved via high-volume, low-complexity queries ([Excessive Queries](/techniques/AML.T0034.000)) or low-volume, high-complex…
Tactics
Impact
ATT&CK cross-reference
No Enterprise ATT&CK cross-reference.
ATLAS mitigations & SSG coverage
AML.M0004
Limit AI Service Query Volume and Rate
Partial
Usage metering per device; not a general-purpose rate limiter
AML.M0019
Control Access to AI Models and Data in Production
Partial
Fail-closed entitlement gating on production value surfaces
AML.M0035
AI Red Team
Partial
SHAKEDOWN benchmark exercises containment; not a full red-team program
AML.M0036
Limit AI Workload Resource Consumption
Not addressed
Workload resource quota enforcement
Methodology. Catalog: MITRE ATLAS v2026.08 (atlas.mitre.org).
Coverage tiers are derived from MITRE's own published mitigation↔technique mappings — never hand-assigned per technique.
SSG's claim is limited to which ATLAS mitigations it implements as controls; it does not claim to cover ATLAS techniques directly.
A tier records which SSG control exists for a MITRE-published mitigation — it is not a statement about outcome, and it is not a certification, an audit result, or an endorsement by MITRE.