SSG coverage claim · MITRE ATLAS-mapped
Browse AI-system risk by MITRE ATLAS
Browse the MITRE ATLAS v2026.08 tactic & technique taxonomy for AI systems, alongside SSG's own derived coverage tier for each technique — see the methodology note below for exactly what that tier does and does not claim.
AI-enabled systems often rely on open-source models in various ways. Most commonly, the victim organization may be using these models for fine-tuning.
Tactics
Initial Access
ATT&CK cross-reference
No Enterprise ATT&CK cross-reference.
ATLAS mitigations & SSG coverage
AML.M0005
Control Access to AI Models and Data at Rest
Not addressed
Data-at-rest infrastructure control
AML.M0006
Predictive AI Ensembles
Not addressed
Model architecture choice
AML.M0008
Validate AI Model
Not addressed
Model evaluation practice
AML.M0013
Code Signing
Partial
Published rulesets are signed and transparency-logged; does not sign models
AML.M0017
AI Model Distribution Methods
Not addressed
Model distribution policy
AML.M0035
AI Red Team
Partial
SHAKEDOWN benchmark exercises containment; not a full red-team program
Methodology. Catalog: MITRE ATLAS v2026.08 (atlas.mitre.org).
Coverage tiers are derived from MITRE's own published mitigation↔technique mappings — never hand-assigned per technique.
SSG's claim is limited to which ATLAS mitigations it implements as controls; it does not claim to cover ATLAS techniques directly.
A tier records which SSG control exists for a MITRE-published mitigation — it is not a statement about outcome, and it is not a certification, an audit result, or an endorsement by MITRE.